[cfaussie] Re: calling COM on a remote server.

Wed, 31 May 2006 23:45:14 -0700

*IF* the problem is in the Corba/COM bridge - then writing it in Java wouldn't help much.

Gary


On 6/1/06, Duncan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

10 machines - yes afraid so, 2 cf 5, 1 x cf7, 7 x cf 6.1

The COM object connects to an AI server - www.burning-glass.com

It all works very reliably in 6.1 and we have no problems at all.

I have looked at DCOM and am having some serious issues getting it
going - has anyone done this / have some instructions on how to do it?

I was also just looking at trying to write a java wrapper to do the
connection and expose the methods - any thoughts on if this would
work?

Thanks

Duncan

On 6/1/06, darryl lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Further to this, the COM object itself must be registered to accept
> remote calls, via DCOM I think.
>
> On 6/1/06, Gary Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ABN AMRO Morgans run 6 load balanced machines (but through a hardware load
> > balancer).]
> >
> > With regard to the original question of running COM (in any shape or form)
> > on CF7 (or even CF6 for that matter)...... we have found that since the move
> > to Java (in the first instance in CF6) that not all COM continues to work -
> > basically (I have been told) because of the CORBA-COM bridging.
> >
> > So - I guess this might have something to do with why it works even less
> > reliably in CF7.
> >
> > What is the purpose of the COM object that makes it so server intensive?
> > Have you considered an alternative approach to achieve the same result?
> > Possibly using some of the new Asynchronous mechanisms in CF7?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gary Menzel
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/1/06, Patrick Branley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > We need this because we run 10 load
> > > > balanced CF machines,
> > >
> > >
> > > what the ? thats huge!
> > >
> > > the biggest ive heard about in aus is 4 machines  ? anyone running any
> > bigger installs than that ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We are looking to make the move to CF7.1 from 6.1 and the following
> > > > code is proving to be a problem.
> > > >
> > > > <cfobject action="" context="REMOTE" server=" 192.168.0.101"
> > > > type="COM" name="talker"
> > class={C89B6335-B690-11D5-8A14-00D0B790C084}>
> > > >
> > > > In 6.1 CF connects to the com correctly on the other machine and we are
> > > > able to carry out the actions. We need this because we run 10 load
> > > > balanced CF machines, and the COM program is quite heavy so we cant
> > > > install it on all the machines.
> > > >
> > > > On running this code on a cf 7 box I get the folowing:
> > > >
> > > > An exception occurred when instantiating a Com object.
> > > > The cause of this exception was that: AutomationException: 0x80040154 -
> > > > Class not registered.
> > > >
> > > > The error occurred in C:\inetpub\wwwroot\testai.cfm: line 2
> > > >
> > > > 1 :
> > > > 2 : <cfobject action="" context="REMOTE" server=" 192.168.0.101"
> > > > type="COM" name="talker"
> > class={C89B6335-B690-11D5-8A14-00D0B790C084}>
> > > > 3 :
> > > >
> > > > Why does this work in 6 and not in 7?
> > > >
> > > > Any healp GREATLY appreciated
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Duncan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >  >
> >
>
> >
>


--
Duncan I Loxton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to