> if CF8 has some extra OO stuff (which it should) then you might regret using > a framework at all. But even with the current model, you can do proper cfc > development.
Huh? You mean better OO stuff like Java has? A lot of J2EE development is still done using frameworks, so I don't think the "full OO functionality = don't need a framework" logic really follows. You are right in saying that a good custom solution will work - sure it will, but I don't think that is an argument against frameworks. I think the bottom line is as other people have said - the right tool for the job. I'm not religious about specific frameworks, I just think that in my experience using a decent framework has helped me make a better end product. -- Mark Stanton Gruden Pty Ltd http://www.gruden.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
