Thanks for that, Dale. And it's really interesting that all
this should come up today, as literally just this morning as I woke up, I had an
idea come to mind of creating a "blog of the day" kind of review
mechanism. It could serve a similar purpose to your idea, Dale. Again,
there are already the long lists of "who's in the 'goog or MXNA" available at
each site, and the aggregators already pull their content
together.
What I mean is instead a way to have someone...well, not
"rate" them...but just review them to indicate which are of a sort that offer a
lot of useful info and indicate that so people can (if they get the daily feed)
be made aware of what blogs out there may interest them. It addresses the very
problem you raise, Dale, where FAAG (or MXNA) might by their feeds alone deliver
too much. So if one (like you) wants to just get a few key feeds,
which ones should they watch? And some bloggers may publish only once a month,
or less, so their content is easily lost in the aggregators' feeds, especially
if some newsworthy even suddenly has the blogosphere abuzz.
It just seems that such a "blog a day" mechanism could help
alleviate that and give notice to some perhaps lesser known but useful blogs. I
was torn whether to do such a thing in my blog, or as a blog of its own. Either
way, it could be aggregated in Ray's new http://www.coldfusionportal.org,
which could become a good place to gather such stuff.
Speaking of how the aggregators tend to fill with one
subject when some news breaks out, it's hard to avoid it. Some of us try
specifically NOT to pass on such news, knowing others will do it. And let's not
fault those who do. Keep in mind that some bloggers have an audience that
they're serving, and they may presume that their readers don't also read the
blogs of others. Indeed, in the scenario you describe of someone watching only a
subset of blogs, if all of those there tended to avoid "commenting on the news",
then the readers of that subset of blogs could well miss out.
It's an interesting conundrum, and one that I've wondered
about in terms of how to make the whole blogosphere more useful. Along those
lines, something else I've thought about is to enable some way for
blog posts to be categorized more topically so as to be more effectively
aggregated (rather than regarded as news that you'll see only if you're
"watching" that day). It strikes me that some sort of global tagging mechanism
might work, and I think such may exist, where the blog poster doesn't just "make
up" categories or tags but instead chooses ones that are agreed upon and shared
by a community they're within. Then all their posts are collected in those
categories so that a visitor to an aggregator that watches them (perhaps your
new one!) could then see topics not "by date" but rather by subject. And not
focusing on "what's come up today", but what are the blog entries on a given
topic, if I'm coming to look into tips on that topic.
In my mind, it could make the collected wisdom of the
blogosphere (even the subset just of CFers) much more of a library, and less of
a bulletin board.
/charlie
http://www.carehart.org/blog/
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Fraser Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 5:58 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: misunderstanding? RE: [cfaussie] Fullasagoog a waste of time. Charlie, If it were up to me they
would be hand picked and would need to meet one of the following two
criteria.
The other option would be to
force people who wanted to be listed to have a Coldfusion category, a lot do
already. And since your using BlogCFC it would be a no brainer for you to do
also. When you post to your other categories, just also select Coldfusion when
it’s relevant. Yours is one of the good
ones I followed individually before moving to Goog and would be definitely on my
list. Goog would fail as less than 50% of the topics in Coldfusion Category are
Coldfusion. I’ll post a list of all the
CF specific ones I used to follow later, hopefully others can add comments. And
as I said earlier I have no idea how to go about doing an aggregator, but I’m
more than willing. Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- [cfaussie] Re: misunderstanding? RE: [cfaussie] Fullasag... Charlie Arehart
- [cfaussie] Re: misunderstanding? RE: [cfaussie] Ful... Dale Fraser
- [cfaussie] Re: misunderstanding? RE: [cfaussie]... M@ Bourke
- [cfaussie] Re: misunderstanding? RE: [cfaussie]... Charlie Arehart
- [cfaussie] Re: misunderstanding? RE: [cfaus... [EMAIL PROTECTED]