I like this. Just the excuse I was looking for, let's wait and see if there
are any major negatives ;-)

On 6/5/07, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We run 2 machines via a load balancer with sticky sessions, then have
> 3 instances on each machine. the default instance runs testing and
> staging sites, and then we have a cluster that runs 2 instances for
> the production application.
>
> It runs great. The best advantage is that if one instance gets stuck
> with some long running thread the other instance can start taking more
> load and that happens alot faster than a load balancer can recognise a
> problem, this means users get a better experience.
>
> My view on this is that its worth doing, you are effectively adding
> more servers with out the cost of more rackspace.
>
> Its cheap to add some more RAM to hold it all together.
>
> On 6/5/07, Haikal Saadh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Remember that as you add instances, resources available to each
> > individual cluster drops.
> >
> > Now, rather than having stage and live on one machine, wouldn't it make
> > more sense to have two machines?
> >
> >     * One for the live.
> >     * Second one for stage, with maybe an additional instance clustered
> >       with live for failover?
> >
> > Then you get all the _real_ benefits of having a cluster.
> >
> > Although, I still cringe at the thought of stage and live code running
> > on the same box.
> >
> > Taco Fleur wrote:
> > > I am hoping to get some input on the following.
> > >
> > > I have one instance of CF running and one is dormant (STAGING) to
> > > upload new code to and test it out before moving to LIVE.
> > > We are starting out with one machine for CF and will tag on more as
> > > the need arises, my question is, would there be any benefit of putting
> > > a cluster on one machine? The only benefit I could see if the fact
> > > that if one crashes the other one on the same machine takes over. But
> > > its highly likely that the problem on the first instance will
> > > replicate to the second instance in the cluster.. So I'm not sure
> > > anymore... I'm hoping someone can give me a reason to do it, so I can
> > > finally setup my first cluster (yeah)...
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.clickfind.com.au
> > > The new Australian search engine for businesses, products and services
> > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Duncan I Loxton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
>


-- 
*** { . } { . } ****
http://www.clickfind.com.au
The new Australian search engine for businesses, products and services

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to