To be honest I think it’s the 64bit CF server. I had lots of issues with cf
writing file such as cfmail files and doing heavy db access processes like
loops, issues that I never had with the 32 bit platform. I had some real bad
memory consumption issues also, so bad the cf server was becoming
unresponsive and the only way to correct it was to resrart the cf service. I
have recently migrated some sites back to the 32 bit platform and not having
any issues on it. That said, when I first had my 64bit windows os, it was
when cf8 initially came out and I was running the 32bit cf server on the
64bit OS and I didn’t have any problems. It was only when I upgraded to the
64bit cf server that I started having issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: BarryC [mailto:barrychester...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 11:29 AM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
The thread dumps are showing a lot of wait points at native methods, there
are a lot of waits for TCP responses (some database as to be expected, but
most just loading cfm/cfc files and the occasional writing of files). We are
running with a network file share which houses all the files (as we are
running a clustered setup), we're going to do a test with the files hosted
locally on a server shortly, but everything is pointing to the OS or the
Network File Share as being problematic - it could be the OS itself though,
that's why I'm wondering if there's something I don't know about server 2008
that might be an issue.
Do tell about your experience with CF8 on 64 bit OS :)
On May 17, 1:01 pm, "Steve Onnis"<st...@cfcentral.com.au> wrote:
What are the issues? Going from my experience with CF8 on the 64 bit
OS I wont be running CF on 64bit windows OS anymore
-----Original Message-----
From: BarryC [mailto:barrychester...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 11:00 AM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit
Hi,
Does anyone on here run coldfusion 9 on windows server 2008, 64 bit?
We are running in to some performance issues which seem to be at an OS
level and I'm wondering if anyone else has used this configuration with
success.
Thanks
Barry Chesterman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
