On 4/20/05, Darryl Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The scalability in using application scope should be the deciding factor. > The overhead in creating and reading request variables per request, I > would have thought, would be high vs. using a persistant scope that is > only created/written to when it doesn't exist.
Well, I can't speak to scalability since I haven't load tested it but, yes, the application scope version is faster in straight-line testing. However, performance is not the only criteria... :) -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
