I'm with you :) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian LeRoux Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Stand-Alone CFCs?
> Sorry for the lack of participation the last few hours. I had > some trouble with my Shrimp Fried Rice ;) Whew. I hear ya, had some chicken chow mein that's done a number on me these past few days. A number two if you get my drift. :P Sure hope it was chicken.. ok enough of that.. > Anyways, I'm still on the fence about which way to do this. I > think that I'm going to continue to use cfthrow inside my > CFCs until there comes a time that custom exceptions would be > needed for some reason over CF's. Personally I've found nothing wrong w/ cf built in exception handling. This new throw() technique is just another trick to add to that bag. As a rule of thumb, I avoid recreating anything that's already a language construct. I guess that makes me a lazy guy. :) ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
