Also, the private, remote, ect. features of the functions in the cfc's do
not match the standard names of the UDF values.
Could you explain what you mean?
That will make the old concept of fUseboxML an issue. Im supprised the old
crew that was pushing that did not bring that to light in the original
Coldfusion MX beta.
Again, please explain.
To late to correct it now, but standard UML will not model the CFCs correctly.
What? UML is language neutral and is used to model solutions to problems, not language features. What are you on about?
I use UML a lot and have no problems mapping the models onto CFML / CFCs...
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
