> Strictly meeting anyone's definition of OO is pretty > irrelevant, IMHO.
I like this point. A fact being missed all the time. ColdFusion isn't even close to an object language, we have to enforce object programming discipline into our code w/o supporting language constructs opening up the interpretation of what is OO ColdFusion. Much better to ensure you have > sufficiently used the tenets that OO is based upon > (encapsulation, abstraction, and code reuse), and if using > objects makes that easier great. It's just another way to > solve the same problem, and any good solution needs to have > certain characteristics which are separate from the method > used to create the solution. Well said. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
