Doug,
Gettign to an efficient use of CFCs is definitely an evolution - at least
it was for us. The first CFC I wrote was just a rewrite of something I had
in a custom tag. If I recall, it only had a single method in it - not
exactly a stellar example of CFC use for sure. However, as my
understanding of CFCs grew, and OO in general (I had never done much with
OO before CFCs got me interested), I found I was able to evolve my use of
them accordingly (having Brendan O'Hara on staff, with his understanding of
design patterns and how they can be applied to CFCs hasn't hurt either!)
-Rob
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cfczone.org on 11/14/2003 10:13:33 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: CFC and actual use? (was [CFCDev] two CFC bad practices...
)
Rob,
"Of course, part of the beauty of CF is that you can now code procedural,
hybrid, and OO - take your pick."
Hit the nail on the head I'd say. This is akin to saying, what methodology
you use is up to you and your particular problem to solve, eh? CF is a
multi=purpose tool for sure. You can go the whole nine, or just a yard or
two, eh?
Nathan...no FUD intended, just in the throws of 'CF growing pains' I
suppose. I'm using CFCs now and all, but I seem to violate many of the
best practises I read. But then I think perhaps many of these best
practises are ultra idealistic OOPs. Time to read more OOP stuff I
suppose....learn about which camp to pitch a tent in.
Doug
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev'
in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported
by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
