>The decision to move to Mach-ii came down from management. I didn't resist because like you I've found the framework decision to be of withering significance.
Well, if you're all quite familar with OO programming from other languages, i'd agree. But if you're not, then you may find you'll have a steeper learning curve getting into Mach-ii than you thought, maybe much steeper. If you have the time and space for that, and your company can afford that, great. At this point, i'd say it's really a worthy investment of time and energy. But what i've found and what i continue to run across almost every day is that rather than cfc's not being OO enough, I'M not OO enough! Like yesterday, i was working with a sub / super type combination, and suddenly i realized that because of other code needed it down the line, i needed to get a variable's value from the super into the subtype. I got hung up on that (AGAIN!) for hours. Before anyone chimes in and says "Well, looks like you have a flaw in your design" ... i finally figured out that the flaw was in how i was conceiving of the problem. Once i straightened that out, the code took literally 2 minutes and was squeaky clean. Well, at least i thought so :) If you want a code sample demonstrating something specific, just ask. Otherwise it's hard to guess what would be helpful in context. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
