it sounds like you have a client you won't be able to convince - even if you do s/he will probably never feel truly at ease with mach-ii. I advise that you save this battle for another day.
good luck On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:19:27 -0500, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Joe Ferraro > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 10:15 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security concerns > > > > My client asks that I prove "true containership" in mach-ii. Any > > Suggestions? > > Um... Photoshop-up a "TC Certified" logo and place it at the bottom of your > specification? > > Jim Davis > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > -- -------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.rawlinson.us I have 9 gmail invites,want one? ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
