On 10/28/05, Massimo, Tiziana e Federica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "... Using a $ to denote something says that you are unable to properly > > name your methods (or variables)... " was just funny, it implies that > > Ruby developers are not able to properly name variables. > > Or maybe Ruby language's designers don't trust Ruby developers for being > able to properly name variables? :-)))
Or maybe they just don't care about naming variables? I mean, heck, you can overload the [] operator, or +. Or change the behavior of the number 3 so it's different from 4. Ruby is just crazy :) -- John Paul Ashenfelter CTO/Transitionpoint (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
