|
Also the file > new > other > CFC
dialogue in CFEclipse perspective will create getters
and setters. It also will add empty
methods with arguments that you specify. It’s pretty nifty. My only gripe is that the return or argument
type can’t be a string of my choosing. For objects, I default to “any”
and change them when I write the method code. Of course now Hal Helms is arguing against
strong typing in CF (see the latest CFDJ - http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/read/167973.htm
) I’ll be curious to see part 2 of the article next month. Just when you think something’s a
best practice…maybe it isn’t…or is…or might be…sometimes.
It depends. anthony From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raphael Gerber (codeyard) I'm tired of writing Setters and Getters
all the time as well. That's why I added the following snippet to
Eclipse/Homesite: <cffunction
name="set$${Name}" returntype="void"
access="$${Access:private|public}" output="false" <cffunction name="get$${Name}"
returntype="$${Type:any|array|binary|boolean|date|guid|numeric|query|string|struct|uuid|xml}"
access="public" output="false" Raphael Gerber -----Original Message----- I like the use of beans as a bridge to transport
data between the presentation layer (forms) and business objects, which do all
the database interactions. Constructing beans can be a repetitive and
time-consuming task, so lately I have been toying around with a different
transfer object that acts like a bean, but it is easier to build, add on, and
maintain. I would like your opinions on it and whether it is a good or
bad. Instead of writing a bean that has getters and
setters and will interface like this: <cfset
objFilter=CreateObject(“component”,”reportFilter”).init(dsn)> Method #1 <cfset
objFilter.setFirstname=”John”> <cfset objFilter.setLastName=”Doe”> I then pass this objFilter into my business
object. Inside the business object, the values in the filter object will
be accessed like this: Arguments.objFilter.getFirstName(); Arguments.objFilter.getLastName(); Method #2 I have been toying with this method: <cfset objFilter.add('firstname','John')> <cfset objFilter.add('lastname','Doe')> Inside my business object, I would access the values
of the objFilter like this: Arguments.objFilter.getValue('lastName') Arguments.objFilter.getValue('firstname') The advantage I see in Method 2 is that as the
business object requires additional filter parameters, the objFilter object
doesn't require the maintenance of adding more getters or setters. Any thought on the good or bad on Method #2 is
appreciated. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] |
Title: Message
- RE: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Anthony Israel-Davis
- RE: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Hal Helms
- Re: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Bill Rawlinson
- Re: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Sean Corfield
- RE: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Jim Davis
- RE: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Hal Helms
- Re: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Joe Rinehart
- RE: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Jim Davis
- RE: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Hal Helms
- Re: [CFCDev] Bean and CFC question Sean Corfield
