Thanks Dave!

Is Nolan's syntax the name-valued pair that you are talking about or
is there another way of getting at this?

-Aaron

On 6/23/06, Aaron Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nolan,

your syntax worked just fine. I am wondering if there is some other
way that Dave might be getting at. Also, I am still wondering if I
should even take this approach since one would have to know the exact
spelling of the arguments in the method.

-Aaron

On 6/23/06, Aaron Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can specify name-value pairs ("named notation") in any order; the
> > default notation where you specify the values in order is called "positional
> > notation".
>
> Dave, could you give me an example of the syntax for name-value pairs?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>



----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to 
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the 
email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting 
(www.cfxhosting.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


Reply via email to