On 9/27/07, Peter Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not quite. I prefer get(PropertyName) to get#PropertyName#() - syntactically > it's a little easier to implement in CF. Again, works great for my use case, > your mileage may vary. >
Well, when your mileage catches up with mine, you can have onMissingMethod accept get#PropertyName#() calls and deprecate get(PropertyName). ;-) Patrick -- Patrick McElhaney 704.560.9117 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
