On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Clarkee21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No the Controller is CFC based as that's what the non-xml version of > FB requires :-)
Well, no, actually it doesn't require controllers to be CFCs but that is the common convention. >> The non-xml FB is a way to change the controllers from xml to cfc's. The >> Model should always be cfc's. > The model pages are CFM not CFCs. To be honest I'm still to see a > Fusebox application which doesn't use CFM for it's model's fuses. Look at Brian Kotek's Bookstore example. It uses CFCs for the model and and the controller call methods on the model directly (instead of using CFM pages for model fuseactions and having those call methods on the model). -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
