@John, I agree that an IBO is a pattern to tackle a cf-related problem and I hope I stop using it soon but while I'm still nervous with the object instantiation issue I'll still use an IBO over a query (in some cases) and an array of objects (in some cases)
Alan www.alanlivie.com ________________________________ From: John Whish <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:25:22 AM Subject: [CFCDEV] Re: Analysis and Design process @Sean, totally agree that Flip doesn't help with modelling applications. @Alan and Barry, sounds like you're both IBO fans. I'm really torn on that one. I like the end result of using an IBO (and think it is a pretty elegant solution), but worry that it is a pattern used because of ColdFusion's expensive object creation. It's hard to integrate it properly with Transfer and as object creation becomes less of an issue I can see less of a need for it. I use OO to make future maintainability easier, so seems a bit odd to use something that I potentially would want to replace. Of course I always keen to hear everyones thoughts :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
