On Jul 23, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote: > Author: kremenek > Date: Wed Jul 23 17:19:56 2008 > New Revision: 53964 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=53964&view=rev > Log: > Don't flag dead stores when the result of a preincrement/ > predecrement is used in an enclosing expression.
So you don't warn about "print(++x)" if x is dead after that? Why not warn "consider changing ++x to 'x+1'"? -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
