On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Daniel Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, this is better than what was before, but we still need to handle this case
> if we want gems like
> --
> enum x { v = (char*) 0 - (char*) 0 };
> --
> to behave as they do in GCC.I'm well aware of that issue; see http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2008-July/002232.html. Essentially, my proposal is to push the handling for this case outside of isICE. I haven't gotten around to implementing it yet, though. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
