On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> More interesting than __null would be to implement nullptr, the real
> null pointer constant from C++0x.
Even with an implementation of nullptr, we probably wouldn't want to
#define NULL nullptr. The C++ committee decided not to create this
define (since it will break existing code), and we should follow their
lead.
That said, I'd like to avoid implementing the __null oddity if we can.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
