On Nov 11, 2008, at 6:30 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Author: ddunbar >> Date: Tue Nov 11 18:01:12 2008 >> New Revision: 59094 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=59094&view=rev >> Log: >> Disable generation of basic block names in NDEBUG mode. >> >> Revert to enabling generation of instruction names when not in NDEBUG >> mode. > > Is this really a good idea? Normally NDEBUG doesn't change the > visible behavior of the program.
This also breaks abi compatibility between .o files produced in debug and release builds. I don't know how much that matters in practice. What case are instruction names useful for? -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
