On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote: > Mike Stump wrote: >> On Nov 11, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Sebastian Redl wrote: >>>> Is this incorrect code ? >>> Yes, according to 5.2.4p2: "The type designated by the >>> pseudo-destructor-name shall be the same as the object type."
> Hmm, seems I was too hasty there. :-) The fun of reading a standard. Just keep in mind, the people that work on g++ have had a presense on the standards committee since before 1992 and can change the working paper to reflect g++'s behavior, so, even if you think you know what the standard says, it might not. :-) I think we should file a bug report against g++ anytime we think they got it wrong, so that in the end, at least g++ and clang can agree upon what the standard says. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
