On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Daniel Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, perhaps I did not do a good job explaining. However, I don't > understand why you reverted... can you explain what you think is wrong > with this approach? I have no problem doing it differently, I was just > trying to address regressions I was seeing...
Oh, I see... sorry about that; I completely missed the bug you were trying to fix because of the other behavior changes the patch contained. I'll take a shot at a proper fix. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
