Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Not sure if this is what Doug meant, but instead of "splitting" this > is probably a good candidate to just replace the mouthful with %0 and > supply the appropriate value at run time. > Nah, 'reference' is not a language keyword, so the message wouldn't be localizable. I could make one diagnostic for non-const and non-static, but the static/mutable mismatch is detected by the parser, so the "non-static" violation is never reported by the sema.
Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
