On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Author: ddunbar > Date: Wed Nov 12 06:31:28 2008 > New Revision: 59130 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=59130&view=rev > Log: > Start a README.txt of possible optimizations to do in IRgen.
> > +// > = > = > = > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ===// > + > +Bitfields should not reload the stored value just to return the > +correct result. > + > +// > = > = > = > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ===// Is this even correct? If a bitfield is volatile, is the extra re-read valid? -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
