Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Redl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does this take into account the seriously weird ways in which a destructor
>> can be called?
>>
>> struct Foo {
>> typedef Foo Bar;
>> };
>> typedef Foo Baz;
>>
>> Foo f;
>> f.Baz::~Bar()
>>
>
> Yuck.
Heh!
There are about 5 defect reports about the exact rules of destructor
calls. Let's not forget that when we implement it.
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
