On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Anders Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1 dec 2008 kl. 04.33 skrev Eli Friedman: > >> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Anders Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Author: andersca >>> Date: Mon Dec 1 00:27:38 2008 >>> New Revision: 60331 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=60331&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Fix test. (0 && (a(),1)) is a valid I-C-E according to C99. >> >> No, it isn't. Note the requirement about operands; "a" is a global, >> which isn't allowed. >> > > Ah, I see - I got ICEs and regular constant expressions mixed up. Maybe the > test should fail when in strict C (not gnu) mode?
We've had this discussion before... my instinct is that we don't want to do this. gcc is planning on fixing their ICEs correctly for 4.5 (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg01061.html), and glibc will have a fixed tgmath.h in the next release (http://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-cvs/2008-q4/msg00091.html). Therefore, I think we want to just make this an error unconditionally. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
