Mike Stump wrote: > On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Sebastian Redl wrote: >> taking a number that appeared to be in the middle of the observed times) > > Always just take the fastest. In that case, it went from 0.49 to 0.49. > > That's a whopping 4%. Seems like not much now, but after people > squeeze out the 20%s and 60%s, there won't be much left but the 4%. Yes, but the 4% may come from my changes, or from the dozens of other changes during the same time.
Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
