On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Mike Stump <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 18, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> 1. Can tools/driver/driver.cpp pass this in instead of having inside the >> lib. The version should be particular to the client not the library. >> > > Not a big deal, but how would one get the library version information then? > In theory, we want the library to offer component bits for the version > information, and default formatting with the ability of the client to > override formatting as they see fit. It doesn't make any sense for the > client to tell the library what version the library is at. The client can > merely say how it wants the information formatted. >
Ok, this makes sense to me. 2. Not sure about this; but do you have enough Makefile foo that we could >> automatically do this every time the clang-driver executable was linked (but >> only then)? >> > > I'm not sure I see a difference between the two. Could you elaborate your > concern? > I probably misunderstood what was happening; is this information getting rebuilt on every svn update? Should we share this information with the clang(-cc/frontend/pick your name) binary so that we can more easily diagnose ccc/clang mismatches? - Daniel
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
