================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/google-explicit-make-pair.cpp:18
@@ +17,3 @@
+void templ(T a, T b) {
+ std::make_pair<T, unsigned>(a, b);
+}
----------------
Alexander Kornienko wrote:
> I assume the check should suggest replacements in cases where there are no
> dependent types, but could you add a test? And one more instantiation, so
> that we actually test a case where something can go wrong due to templates.
We completely ignore code in template instantiations at the moment. It would be
nice to check for code in templates that does not contain any dependencies on
the template arguments but it's not tricky to match (or do we have an
ASTMatcher for it?)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4497
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
