================ Comment at: include/chrono:943 @@ -941,1 +942,3 @@ typedef steady_clock high_resolution_clock; +#else +typedef system_clock high_resolution_clock; ---------------- danalbert wrote: > Should there be a warning that the system won't use steady_clock? Implementing high_resolution_clock via a typedef to system_clock is explicitly allowed by the standard. I don't see a reason for a warning here.
================ Comment at: libcxx/test/utilities/time/time.clock/time.clock.steady/consistency.pass.cpp:14 @@ -13,2 +13,3 @@ // XFAIL: with_system_lib=x86_64-apple-darwin12 +// XFAIL: no-monotonic-clock ---------------- danalbert wrote: > I'd use UNSUPPORTED instead. Ok http://reviews.llvm.org/D4045 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
