On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Ulrich Weigand <[email protected]> wrote:
> David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote on 13.01.2015 20:47:36: > > > Thanks, sorry for the breakage. > > > > It looks like this is fixed by re-applying my patches to rework all > > this location stuff > ( http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=225555&view=rev > > ) - which has a few other bugs I'm trying to figure out before > recommitting. > > > > Sorry for the breakage. We can go back further & revert more > > patches, or hopefully wait another day or two if I can ignore email > > long enough to fix the remaining issues with that work. > > Thanks for looking into this! > > I'm fine with waiting a couple of days; however, I understand LLVM 3.6 > is going to branch tomorrow, and this regression seems serious enough > that it really ought to be fixed on the branch as well (one way or > the other) ... > Fair point - will try to get something sorted by then. Feel free to ping/throw things at me/etc if I don't & we'll integrate something into the branch. - David > > Bye, > Ulrich > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
