On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:33 PM, George Burgess IV <[email protected]> wrote: > You can request that CFLAA is run in opt/clang by passing in a few flags, but > it’s not on by default, and there are known correctness issues that we’re > currently working through. > > Unless anyone feels strongly otherwise, I think it would be best to not add > CFLAA until we’re highly confident that it doesn’t give incorrect results. > Preferably it would be enabled by default (and/or shown to Make Things > Faster™) at the time of mention as well, but correctness comes first. :)
Sounds good to me. Thanks! >> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The 3.6 release is drawing nearer, but the release notes could still >>> use a lot of improvement: >>> >>> LLVM: >>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/release_36/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst >>> Clang: >>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/release_36/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst >>> >>> The good news is that they can be updated all the way up until >>> release. If you have a patch for the release notes, commit it directly >>> to the branch, or send it to me and I'll commit it for you. It doesn't >>> even have to be a patch proper, just send me some text! >>> >>> I've been going through Alex's excellent weekly news >>> (http://llvmweekly.org) to figure out what changed. >>> >>> Here's a list of things that might be worth mentioning in the notes: >>> >>> LLVM: >>> - the new CFL alias analysis >> >> Is this hooked up by default? Should we mention it in the notes? > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
