Hi Mark, Do you want to add #pragma unroll back to the release notes for 3.6?
- Hans On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Heffernan <[email protected]> wrote: > And here are the patches... > > Mark > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Mark Heffernan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sorry, forgot about this :-( Here's the patched to release_35 which >> removes reference to unroll-related pragmas and the respective metadata as >> discussed earlier in the thread. These are doc-only (*.rst) patches. OK? >> >> Bill, can these be merged to the release branch? Background: 3.5 was cut >> in the middle of a number of changes to support the unroll pragma. Since >> the cut, the metadata and unroll pragma syntax have changed and a couple of >> small bug fixes went in. These doc patches remove any reference to the >> unroll pragma and metadata so we don't have to carry forward support for the >> older syntax. Also, this avoid publicizing the unroll pragmas which at the >> time of the cut had a couple of unpatched bugs. >> >> Thanks! >> Mark >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Hal Finkel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> > From: "Mark Heffernan" <[email protected]> >>> > To: "Hal Finkel" <[email protected]> >>> > Cc: "Eric Christopher" <[email protected]>, "cfe-commits" >>> > <[email protected]>, [email protected], >>> > "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]> >>> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 6:22:16 PM >>> > Subject: Re: release_35 patches for unroll pragma >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Hal Finkel < [email protected] > >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Unfortunately, I was on vacation that week, and I'm still playing >>> > catch-up on my e-mail... >>> > >>> > At this point I think it is too late to pull in these kinds of >>> > changes, but, if we didn't previously, we should add auto-upgrade >>> > support for the renamed metadata. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Recently got back from vacation myself... Earlier in the thread there >>> > was the suggestion of removing mention of the unroll pragma and >>> > metadata from the 3.5 docs because support for it is incomplete. I >>> > agree and I'll send out a patch for this. Would it still be >>> > necessary to add the auto-upgrade support since the unroll pragma >>> > and associated metadata would not be officially supported? >>> >>> If it is not documented nor officially supported, probably not. >>> >>> -Hal >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Mark >>> > >>> > >>> > -Hal >>> > >>> > > >>> > > -eric >>> > > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Hal Finkel >>> > Assistant Computational Scientist >>> > Leadership Computing Facility >>> > Argonne National Laboratory >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Hal Finkel >>> Assistant Computational Scientist >>> Leadership Computing Facility >>> Argonne National Laboratory >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
