In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7318#126692, @LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7318#125262, @mclow.lists wrote: > > > I don't have a problem with making this a clang-tidy module, but it was > > (also) meant as an example of how to write a refactoring tool. > > > Do we now have enough examples of refactoring tools that the example > motivation is no longer a concern? I didn't find any references to remove-cstr-calls from docs, so I don't think the tool is in any sense special. There is a `clang-rename` which can be used as an example of a refactoring tool, and there is a dedicated `tool-template`. IMO, these should be enough. http://reviews.llvm.org/D7318 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
