================
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/RemoveVoidArg.cpp:174
@@ +173,3 @@
+void RemoveVoidArg::processFieldDecl(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result, 
FieldDecl const *const Member) {
+    std::string const Text = getText(Result, *Member);
+    removeVoidArgumentTokens(Result, Member->getLocStart(), Text, "Redundant 
void argument list in field declaration.");
----------------
LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> sbenza wrote:
> > LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> > > sbenza wrote:
> > > > LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> > > > > sbenza wrote:
> > > > > > Any reason all of these convert the StringRef into a std::string?
> > > > > > Couldn't they work with the StringRef directly?
> > > > > I tried switching it to a StringRef, but when I tried to combine it 
> > > > > with other text to build a replacement for diag(), it got turned into 
> > > > > Twine and then failed to match any signature for diag().  I'm open to 
> > > > > suggestions for what you'd like to see instead.
> > > > Twine::str() constructs the string.
> > > > I don't mind constructing a string when a match happens. Those are rare.
> > > > But we should avoid allocating memory when no match happens.
> > > > Right now temporary memory allocations are a considerable part of 
> > > > clang-tidy's runtime. We should try to minimize that.
> > > I think we are at that stage now; I do all early-out testing before 
> > > constructing the replacement string.
> > You are still generating a copy of the code before re-parsing it.
> > Those will happen for anything that passes the matcher, even if they have 
> > no 'void' argument.
> > removeVoidArgumentTokens should take the code as a StringRef directly from 
> > getText(), without converting to std::string first. GrammarLocation should 
> > also be a StringRef.
> > Basically, avoid std::string until you are about to call diag().
> I'll look into having getText return the StringRef and using that.  I don't 
> understand the fuss over GrammarLocation, however.  Before I had it as a 
> constant string that was just passed through and then another review wanted 
> the duplication in the message eliminated, so I pulled that out.  Now you're 
> saying that the string joining induced by the elimination of duplication is 
> bad.  It doesn't seem possible to satisfy both comments.
The problem with GrammarLocation is that it is declared as a 'const std::string 
&' and you are always passing literals.
This is what StringRef is for. It will avoid the unnecessary temporary string.
The signature would read like:

    void RemoveVoidArg::removeVoidArgumentTokens(
        const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result, SourceLocation StartLoc,
        StringRef DeclText, StringRef GrammarLocation);

Then you can construct the Lexer with an std::string, like:

    clang::Lexer PrototypeLexer(StartLoc, Result.Context->getLangOpts(),
                                DeclText.data(), DeclText.data(),
                                DeclText.data() + DeclText.length());

http://reviews.llvm.org/D7639

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to