In http://reviews.llvm.org/D4169#68650, @dblaikie wrote:
> You could probably be a bit narrower than POD types - probably just > types with trivial copy constructors. But for now "all POD types" > shouldn't have any false positives, only false negatives - so perhaps > leave it that way with a FIXME Describing a narrower check for small > types (small to be defined/discovered) with trivial copy construction. Have you addressed these suggestions? I don't recall where this was all left, exactly. http://reviews.llvm.org/D4169 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
