Hi majnemer,
r230921 broke backend-optimization-failure.cpp: after
r230921, LLVM no longer emits an expression to compute 'Length - 1'
and this perturbs LoopSimplify enough to emit the warning on line 10
instead of line 9. This is a review request to fix the test case once
I re-land r230921.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7993
Files:
test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
Index: test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
+++ test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
void test_switch(int *A, int *B, int Length) {
#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable) unroll(disable)
- /* expected-warning {{loop not vectorized: failed explicitly specified loop
vectorization}} */ for (int i = 0; i < Length; i++) {
- switch (A[i]) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < Length; i++) {
+/* expected-warning {{loop not vectorized: failed explicitly specified loop
vectorization}} */ switch (A[i]) {
case 0:
B[i] = 1;
break;
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
Index: test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
+++ test/Misc/backend-optimization-failure.cpp
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
void test_switch(int *A, int *B, int Length) {
#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable) unroll(disable)
- /* expected-warning {{loop not vectorized: failed explicitly specified loop vectorization}} */ for (int i = 0; i < Length; i++) {
- switch (A[i]) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < Length; i++) {
+/* expected-warning {{loop not vectorized: failed explicitly specified loop vectorization}} */ switch (A[i]) {
case 0:
B[i] = 1;
break;
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits