On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Rafael Espíndola < [email protected]> wrote:
> >> In this case the ComdatGV would be the function, which is not private, > no? > > > > > > I was referring to the case where the function has internal linkage (and > we > > have EmitUniquedSection enabled for data sections). The global would be > > private and it wouldn't be possible to stick it in a COMDAT. > > I don't follow, if the function is internal, ComdatGV will be the > function and have internal linkage, no? > The function will be internal but why would the ComdatGV be the function? I don't see how the function would be in a COMDAT in that case. > > In any case, if there is a CodeGen limitation for COFF, using internal > for COFF and private for MachO/ELF for now is probably fine. > > I will try to open a bug to track "private in comdat for COFF". > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Rafael >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
