================
Comment at: lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp:2313
@@ -2313,4 +2312,3 @@
MicrosoftCXXNameMangler Mangler(*this, Out);
- Mangler.getStream() << "_CT??_R0";
- Mangler.mangleType(T, SourceRange(), MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::QMM_Result);
- Mangler.getStream() << "@8";
+ Mangler.getStream() << "_CT";
+
----------------
rnk wrote:
> Does this get mangled to __CT... on 32-bit? Do we need \01?
Yes, it gets mangled to __CT on 32-bit which would mean that we wouldn't want
\01, right?
================
Comment at: lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp:2315-2320
@@ +2314,8 @@
+
+ llvm::SmallString<64> RTTIMangling;
+ {
+ llvm::raw_svector_ostream Stream(RTTIMangling);
+ mangleCXXRTTI(T, Stream);
+ }
+ Mangler.getStream() << RTTIMangling.substr(1);
+
----------------
rnk wrote:
> Stupid '\01' mangling. When we drop it, we can simply run the mangler on the
> Out stream.
Happily :)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8101
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
