David Blaikie <[email protected]> writes: > On Mar 16, 2015 4:57 PM, "Justin Bogner" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Author: bogner >> Date: Mon Mar 16 18:52:21 2015 >> New Revision: 232439 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=232439&view=rev >> Log: >> GCOV: Expose the -coverage-exit-block-before-body flag in clang -cc1 >> >> This exposes the optional exit block placement logic from r232438 as a >> clang -cc1 option. There is a test on the llvm side, but there isn't >> really a way to inspect the gcov options from clang to test it here as >> well. > > I'm missing something probably - what's the benefit of that over just using > -mllvm to pass this flag to llvm directly? (If I'm remembering how this stuff > works)
I'm not sure - I was matching the -coverage-cfg-checksum and -coverage-no-function-names-in-data CC1 options here. Maybe Nick has thoughts? _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
