On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Vince Harron <[email protected]> wrote:
> In for a dime, in for a dollar. > > When 232793 was reverted, Clang::redecl-add-after-load.cpp began failing > everywhere. > > I also reverting 232853 and 232870 to fix Clang::redecl-add-after-load.cpp > (because they depend on 232793) > > Sorry for all the hassle Richard, I just don't know how long this will > take to sort out and I don't want more errors to pile in unnoticed. > Thanks for the revert (yes, this is consistent with our policy, but please remember to run the tests before committing in future). I've fixed the issue and re-committed the reverted patches as r232928. > Thanks, > > Vince > > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Vince Harron <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> I've reverted this patch. (I hope that's consistent with project >> policy.) Can you please investigate the LLDB failures is causes before >> resubmitting? Please let us know if we can be of any help. For all I >> know, the patch just exposes a bug in LLDB. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Vince >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
