In http://reviews.llvm.org/D8703#149206, @EricWF wrote:
> Pretty much, but I would make the test names more descriptive so they infer
> that these are failure tests for when we have no unsafe C functions. The test
> names don't *have* to follow the standard names.
Got it. What do you think about the following naming scheme? I've named them
`${function}.thread-unsafe.fail.cpp`.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8703
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
