In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9036#156719, @rnk wrote:
> As discussed, this flag actually affects overload resolution results, so it > should probably be a language option as it is now. Maybe we shouldn't be > having this target check affect overload results, but that's another big > issue that we don't need to run down right this instant. > > lgtm Right. In the long run, I think that letting it affect overload resolution is actually beneficial if we want to consider proper overloading based on target attributes. http://reviews.llvm.org/D9036 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
