> 1. Are there means to evolve the ABI?
I started a discussion about this a month or so ago, but it petered out w/o a conclusion. There are users of libc++ for whom *any* ABI change is unacceptable. There are also users of libc++ who (as you say), "build the world from scratch" regularly, for whom ABI change is a non-issue. We need a scheme that satisfies the first group w/o limiting the second. As for this change, would "fixing" the load on line #102 fix the observed problem? http://reviews.llvm.org/D8147 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
