John, according to the standard 'Only the read and write of the location designated by x are performed mutually atomically. Neither the evaluation of expr or expr_list, nor the write to the location designated by v need be atomic with respect to the read or write of the location designated by x.' I think this means, that store to 'v' must be atomic too, but it does not required to be synchronized with read/update of 'x'. So, I think we can use atomic load of 'x' after atomicrmw for 'x' and we can use atomic store of old/new value of 'x' to 'v' after atomic update of 'x'.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9049 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
