On 1 May 2015 at 20:20, Meador Inge <[email protected]> wrote: > I am very interested in cleaning up -march as well. I have been > experimenting with some local patches to allow for proper -march > handling where -mcpu isn't magically applied when *only* -march is > specified. I am interested in allowing for architecture level code > generation, which currently is impossible because 1) we always compute > the current CPU (sometimes incorrectly) and 2) we don't currently > support generating '.arch' in the ARM backend.
Hi Meador, that is precisely the point of these changes. :) My next change it to use this API in Clang, to replace mfpu / march options. I think there will be a lot missing that Clang accepts and the assembler doesn't. But that's where we need to come with a common approach, so both can support all choices (where valid). cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
