I'm curious - what is the use case for the old behaviour?

AFAICT if the user sets `Enable OpenMP support` `OFF` they'll get a compiler 
that links against `libgomp` when `-fopenmp` is specified, but doesn't produce 
a useful openmp executable?


================
Comment at: test/OpenMP/linking_no_openmp.c:2
@@ +1,3 @@
+// Test the that the driver produces reasonable linker invocations with
+// -fopenmp or -fopenmp|libgomp.
+// REQUIRES: no_openmp
----------------
`-fopenmp=libgomp`?

http://reviews.llvm.org/D9875

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to