I'm also not completely sure of the semantics - I just made it work well enough for the Solaris headers that libc++ needed to work. The changes look fine to me though.
Have they been tested with the various things in compiler-rt that use this pragma? We currently use it as a hack because clang doesn't allow you to implement functions that have the same name as builtins (even when those builtins are ones that need implementing by a function of the same name on some archs). http://reviews.llvm.org/D10187 EMAIL PREFERENCES http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
